PANEL 1
Rachel grabs a frightened catcaller by the collar, looking intimidating against a dark scratchy background.
RACHEL: "Where do you come up with this stuff?"
MAN: "I-I don't know, miss..."
PANEL 2
Close-up of Rachel's angry face as she lectures the cowering man.
RACHEL: "Do you sit around at home, alone, trying to think of ways to ick out the opposite sex, or are you just so socially inept that it's second nature?"
MAN: "Please don't hurt me."
PANEL 3
Rachel looks furious with dramatic action lines radiating behind her. She holds up her fist.
RACHEL: "How dare you degrade me with your unwanted and unchivalrous advances!"
RACHEL: "Now you must pay!"
PANEL 4
Rachel chases the fleeing man through a maze-like background.
RACHEL: "Don't you run away from me! You mess with the cow, you get the horns!"
MAN: "Don't come near me!"
RACHEL: "You brought this on yourself!"
NARRATOR: So much for getting all dressed up!
THE END
“Maybe the hoots have nothing to do with how attractive you are. Maybe it’s how vulnerable you look.” That comes off as kind of victim-blaming…
No blame intended. I meant it more as a statement on the predatory nature of this behavior, of the strong and cowardly preying on the seemingly meek. We don’t blame children when they are sexually abused. We shouldn’t blame vulnerable-looking women when they’re mistreated, either. It’s false logic, a double standard.